|

Instructional Technology
Update
The Benton Foundation recently released the report,
“The Sustainability Challenge: Taking EdTech to the Next Level.” While
the foundation notes that many states are slowing their investment in
classroom technology, it encourages educators to keep education technology
a priority. The report points out positive outcomes accomplished by the
education technology movement in the last decade and recommends ways to
sustain growth and improvement. Instead of slowing down, districts are
encouraged to dedicate professional development funding to improve
technology skills of teachers and create authentic assessments of
education technology that can document meaningful and positive results of
education technology investments.
I know this shift is true in Missouri and at the local level, as
well. I hear about the cuts being made to district technology budgets and
staff FTE. And, I understand that with state and local budget woes and
world peace at risk, it can be difficult to remain positive and upbeat. I
sometimes have to remind myself that my children (indeed, all children)
need a sense of hope and positive role models – and that I am in good
company and not in this alone. I may not be cheerleading quite as much or
as boisterously as in the past, but I have faith that situations will
improve. Meanwhile, I believe it’s important to stay the cause as best
we can. -Deb
FY03
Technology Grants – Funding Levels and End-of-Year Reports
Districts were informed in late February that the TAG
grant program received an additional withholding, lowering the expected
reimbursement rate to 64.6 percent. Likely districts will under-spend in
most, if not all, cost categories and will not need to move funds across
categories. Please contact the Instructional Technology staff if you have
any questions about this matter.
Districts are reminded that final expenditure reports (FERs) must
be submitted by May 15, 2003. The TAG FER is to be filed online. The
eMINTS FER must be mailed or faxed to the Instructional Technology
section. A copy of the eMINTS FER and Request for Amendment forms can be
downloaded from our web site at http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/instrtech/federalfunded/TitleIID/app.pdf.
FY04
Technology Grants – Title IID eMINTS grants
Federal Funding
In March, Newsline announced that the President had signed the federal
budget and that Title IID funding was stable. We expect to operate FY04
Title IID programs like we have in FY03. With about $8 million, we will
distribute half through formula grants and half through competitive
grants. In Missouri the competitive funds are used to expand the eMINTS
professional development program into new districts. The FY04 funding will
support 40 second-year grants and approximately 30-32 first-year grants.
Applications for the FY04 Title IID eMINTS grants
were due March 31. As of April 1, we have received all of the second-year
grant applications and 34 first-year applications. The first-year grants
will be evaluated April 7-8 [along with applications sent to MOREnet for
eMINTS professional development]. Once the applications are reviewed and
scored, Department and MOREnet staffs can make the funding and training
assignments. Applicants can expect to receive a funding status letter on
or near April 21.
State Funding
While we usually have a strong sense of the state budget by late March, it
is not the case this year. In early budget hearings, the technology budget
passed through at level funding. In other words, we could start FY04 with
the about the same amount we had to begin FY03. Hopefully, the state
budget can be balanced without dipping into these funds. If that’s the
case, districts can expect to receive about 70% of their typical TAG
allotment. Also, the Technology Network Project’s (TNP) participation
fee rates will stay the same.
Note that the funding to support the TNP has been
moved out of the Department’s budget (House Bill 2) and moved to the
Department of Higher Education’s budget (House Bill 3). We do not expect
this funding shift to have any effect on programs and services to K-12
schools. Funding for the MOREnet backbone originated under the Department
of Higher Education’s budget and when MOREnet started appearing in two
budgets, this created some confusion in the General Assembly. Please be
assured that the Department will continue to work closely with MOREnet
(and DHE) to plan, implement, and evaluate the programs and services to
K-12 schools.
State
Approval of District Technology Plans
Technology plans from about 400 districts and charter
schools were due March 31. To date, we have received 322
plans. On April 24 and 25, approximately 80 educators will be in Jefferson
City to receive reader training and begin the process of reviewing plans
for state approval. Districts can expect to receive state approval status
letters on or near May 19.
The Missouri Educational Technology Professionals
Association (METPA), once again, volunteered to provide technical
assistance. METPA had a room set aside at the MOREnet Spring Technical
Conference: “Connections 2003” where attendees (with their draft plans
in hand) could come, discuss planning experiences, and have their plans
reviewed by peers. During the course of the two days, March19-20, METPA
met with representatives from over 40 districts. Our appreciation goes to
Becky Hartzell, Everett Loughridge, Judy Manhatton, Susie Graham, and John
Waite. Thank you!
Census
of Technology (COT)
2002 COT
The 2002 state summary report is available on the Instructional Technology
web site at http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/instrtech/statefunded/census/index.htm.
Some of the major findings in 2002 include the following:
Respondents
Internet Connectivity
-
All of the district offices, 97 percent of the buildings,
and 80 percent of instructional rooms
(labs, classrooms, and library media centers) are connected to the
Internet
Student-Computer Ratios
-
232,808 computers are reported across the 2128 buildings
– one computer for 3.82 students
o 211,382 computers reside
in instructional rooms – one per 4.21 students
-
209,700 computers are Internet capable (at
Pentium-level or better)–one computer per 4.24 students
o 190,178 reside in
instructional rooms – one per 4.68 students
-
205,068 computers are connected to the Internet – one
computer per 4.34 students
o 187,032 reside in
instructional rooms – one per 4.76 students
-
190,353 computers are multimedia equipped – one computer
per 4.68 students
o 174,147 reside in
instructional rooms – one per 5.11 students
Training and Technical Assistance
-
On average, buildings schedule two days for professional
development where teachers can learn and upgrade their technology
skills
-
58 percent of buildings rank curriculum development
as the top training priority, followed by instructional technology
integration at 56 percent
-
70 percent of districts rank curriculum integration as the
top technical assistance priority, followed by instructional
integration at 60 percent
Technology Skills and Usage
-
89 percent of districts incorporate technology into core
curriculum guides
-
Most districts have board-approved education technology
standards, with 62 percent having locally-developed standards
o 59 percent have standards
for elementary students
o 54 percent have standards
for middle/junior high school students
o 49 percent have standards
for high school students
o 45 percent have standards
for teachers
o 39 percent have standards
for school administrators
-
96 percent of technology staff, 82 percent of
principals, and 76 percent of teachers are reported to have
intermediate or advance technology skills
-
75 percent of students and 71 percent of teachers
routinely use education software
-
92 percent of principals, 82 percent of teachers, and 14
percent of students routinely use email
-
43 percent of principals, 37 percent of teachers, and 32
percent of students routinely create computer-generated presentations
-
67 percent of principals, 71 percent of teachers, and 65
percent of students routinely use technology for writing / writing
assignments
-
69 percent of principals, 67 percent of teachers, and 59
percent of students routinely use technology for research information
collection
-
38 percent of teachers routinely use technology for
instructional delivery / presentation
-
67 percent of principals and 61 percent of teachers
routinely use technology to track student performance
-
58 percent of principals and 55 percent of teachers
routinely use technology to assess student performance
2003 COT
The 2003 census will be collected April 1-15. While the 2003 COT is
very similar to the 2002 version, districts will note that it is about
half as long and that data have been pre-filled where appropriate. Core
Data Manual pages that correspond to the COT can be accessed at http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/instrtech/core%20data%20manual%20for%20screens%2030%20&%2031.html.
State
Filtering Software Program Update
2002-2003
Last spring and summer, the Department worked the state’s Prime
Vendor, World Wide Technology, Inc. (WWT) to help offer Internet filtering
solutions to schools at reasonable pricing. By placing orders during a
particular application window, WWT was able to leverage costs with the
filtering solution providers. We were able further able to reduce the
pricing with a small state subsidy.
2003-2004
While it is most unlikely the Department or MOREnet will have
the funds to subsidize Internet filtering for FY04, WWT has offered to
help districts buy new and/or renew their current solutions through group
buys. Purchasing through the Prime Vendor Contract gives districts
competitive pricing, as a result of the state’s bidding process. Prices
can be further reduced when bulk purchase orders are processed at the same
time. To take advantage of this offer and to obtain pricing quotes, please
contact:
WWT will need the purchase orders by May 31st for
schools to take advantage of the group pricing.
E-Rate Action Alert
Since December, a number of allegations of waste, fraud and abuse in
the E-Rate program have appeared in the press and in key reports. One such
incident has led to federal prosecutors charging four representatives of
Connect2, Internet Networks, Inc. with attempting to bilk the program of
millions of dollars by convincing schools that they would pay the
undiscounted share of the eligible services for them and that they should
order services far more expensive than they could afford. This incident
and others led to the publication of a report highly critical of the
E-Rate program by the Center for Public Integrity, which included a quote
from an auditor with the Inspector General’s Office that states:
"It's not unfair to say we have found something wrong everywhere we
have looked. It appears to be both intentional and unintentional."
These press reports and negative comments, in turn, spawned the launch of
an investigation by the House Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on
Oversight and Investigations early this year.
E-Rate
events simmered for a while but have reached a boil in the past two weeks.
In quick succession, the following events occurred:
-
The E-Rate's administrator announced that it had denied, in a single
Year 5 funding wave, approximately $590 million in discount requests
on the grounds that the competitive bidding process had been
compromised. Large city districts, including Atlanta, Cleveland,
Dallas and Fort Worth, lost tens of millions of dollars. This
large-scale rejection has caused great consternation in the applicant
and vendor communities.
-
The House Commerce Committee, which had been quietly pursuing its
E-Rate waste, fraud and abuse investigation, publicly demanded
documents pertaining to particular E-Rate applications from the FCC
and the Schools and Libraries Division. The press release accompanying
these requests stated that the investigation was being
"stepped-up" and labeled the E-Rate program
"troubled."
-
Colorado
Congressman Tom Tancredo, a persistent critic of the program,
introduced a bill (HR 1252) that would eliminate the program. The bill
already has four cosponsors.
-
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain called for a hearing on
universal service issues, likely including the E-Rate, for April 2.
-
FCC Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy announced that she would hold a
public forum on May 8 to address potential changes to the E-Rate. The
Commissioner stated that recent events "have convinced me that
the FCC needs to take a hard look at whether our rules provide an
adequate framework to avoid wasteful expenditures and prevent gaming
of the system. While our established procedures have successfully
uncovered instances of program abuse, we need to consider changes to
lessen the potential for waste, fraud, and abuse."
Districts
in favor of keeping the E-rate program may want to contact their senators
and representatives. Email addresses for senators may be found on the
senate website at http://www.senate.gov,
and emails for representatives on the house website at http://www.house.gov.
Offices can be reached through the Capitol Hill switchboard at
202.224.3121. When making contact, be sure to mention the amount of E-Rate
discounts your institution has received, what services you have been
purchased through the discounts, and the educational opportunities
(distance learning courses, professional development, parental
involvement, etc.) that the E-Rate has catalyzed. Include a return address
when emailing. ***Source: email alert provided by Leslie Harris &
Associates.
FY
2002 – Internal Connections Requests to be Funded down to 81%
The SLD
announced it plans to issue Funding Year 2002 funding commitments on
Internal Connections requests down to 81% beginning with Wave 26. The Wave
26 Funding Commitment Decision Letters (FCDL) will be issued on April 7,
2003. The SLD had been funding Internal Connections requests with discount
percentages of 90% and denying such requests with discount percentages
below 80% based on estimated fundable requests and funds available for
this funding year – leaving uncertainty about the possibility of being
able to fund requests with percentages of 80% to 89%.
Many
applicants with Internal Connections requests in the 80% to 89% range have
received FCDLs with a classification of "as yet unfounded."
Applicants who have received such FCDLs for requests with discount
percentages of from 81% to 89% will get new FCDLs in Wave 26 showing
commitments for these requests. At this time, there is no determination
about the ability to fund Internal Connections requests at 80%.
“The
Sustainability Challenge: Taking EdTech To The Next Level”
While many states are
slowing their investment in classroom technology as a result of tight
budgets, technology remains a critical part of education policy, says the
report released by the Benton Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based group
that advocates for education technology. The report relates how the
federal government has spent $40 billion since 1990 to get computers into
classrooms, wire schools for Internet access, and integrate technology
into K-12 teaching – an investment that has paid off. But state budgets
are stretched thin, and spending priorities are changing. To help sustain
the growth and improve education technology, the foundation offers several
recommendations. The report can be downloaded at http://www.benton.org.
***Source: Education Daily, Vol. 36, No. 48, Wednesday, March 12, 2003
New Resources From The Consortium For School Networking (COSN)
Data-Driven Decision Making Initiative
At its 8th Annual K-12
Networking Conference, the Consortium for School Networking (CoSN)
launched its newest leadership initiative, "Data-driven Decision
Making: Vision to Know and Do", a cross-industry resource to assist
educators in the effective use of data. The Initiative will be a source of
up-to-date, unbiased information for educators on collecting,
understanding and using data effectively; an easy to use mechanism for
educating school leaders about data-driven decision making and its
applications in elementary and secondary education; and a nationally
recognized framework for sharing knowledge among educators and
transferring knowledge between the educational and vendor communities.
Information is available at http://www.3D2Know.org.
Online Safety Toolkit
Sponsored by the
BellSouth Foundation, the AOL Time Warner Foundation, Microsoft Corp., and
Sprint Corp., the "Promoting Online Safety" toolkit was created
with the understanding that schools need to be proactive in communicating
with parents and other community members about their online safety
strategies—and parents need to understand the steps they can take to
make sure their children use their home computer in a safe and appropriate
manner. The toolkit components include a handbook, called "Promoting
Online Safety: The Home-School Partnership," designed to help school
leaders develop the message they want to convey to parents and community
members, based on their local circumstances; a 10-minute video that
highlights the experiences of two school districts, one in Pennsylvania
and one in Kansas, as they worked through questions surrounding the best
ways to protect students when they go online; and a presentation to help
school leaders explain to parents and community leaders the steps their
schools are taking to protect children online. School leaders can download
the handbook and presentation at no charge from the project’s web site
at http://www.safewiredschools.org/toolkit
District TCO Tool
Also occurring during
the 8th Annual K-12 Conference was the unveiling of the CoSN/Gartner Total
Cost of Ownership (TCO) tool, a new Web-based tool designed to help K-12
schools assess their technology investments. The latest developments in
CoSN's "Taking TCO to the Classroom" initiative, CoSN and
Gartner, with support from North Central Regional Technology in Education
Consortium (NCRTEC), and in partnership the U.S. Department of Education,
developed the TCO tool by working with four "case study" school
districts of varying sizes in California, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and
Utah. The TCO tool will be fully accessible in April 2003. A detailed list
of data-points required to use the tool is available at http://www.classroomtco.org.
Register now at the TCO site to receive updates about when the TCO tool is
fully operational.
Total Cost of Ownership Webcourse
Register for CoSN's Total
Cost of Ownership for School Leaders web course on the National School
Boards Association's Online Learning Center Campus (April 14 - May 26,
2003). Moderated by Marla Davenport, Director, Learning & Technology,
TIES, this five-week online course is designed to help you grapple with
issues of fiscal accountability; provide a framework outlining the major
considerations when budgeting for technology integration; and help you
respond to the school board and community concerns about investments in
educational technology. Cost is $225 for continuing education
credits. Register at http://www.nsba.org/olc/olc.cfm?assn=2
CoSN Compendium
Many issues in K-12
networking, including leadership and policy concerns, confront and
confound decision-makers in schools, districts, and states. A new CoSN
publication, called the CoSN Compendium, explores these issues. The first
edition is now available and offers educational technology perspectives -
both policy and practical - on topics important to K-12 technology
decision makers. See a sample monograph at http://www.cosn.org/initiatives/compendium/3.pdf.
CoSN members have free online access to the Compendium. Print copies of
the entire eight monographs can be purchased for $39.00 (Members) and
$59.00 (Non-Members). Individual printed monographs can be purchased for
$7.00 and $10.00 respectively. http://209.190.169.202/store/compendium.html.
Classroom Observation
Tools To Measure Ed Tech Impact
A recently published ATEC
report focuses on the current status of classroom observation protocols
and their potential for measuring the impact of the use of technology on
classroom practices. The paper, "Classroom Observation Protocols:
Potential Tools for Measuring the Impact of Technology in the
Classroom," relates to the legislative provisions that require
extensive documentation on the extent to which the technology is not only
available to teachers and students, but how teachers in various classroom
settings are using technologies. Existing reporting efforts do not
provide solid evidence of the impact that the technology is having on
classroom practices of both teachers and students. That's where
classroom observation protocols can be very helpful and effective.
The paper describes several classroom observation protocols that are
currently in use or under development. Peter Dirr, author of the
paper, finds that most of the developers of these protocols are working in
isolation from one another. Consequently, the protocols are not
compatible with one another. Thus, the data they gather is not
aggregatable, and does not contribute to building either a nationwide or
statewide snapshot of the impact of current practices, nor creates a
significant and usable database of ed/tech applications and approaches.
For a copy, see: http://www.the-atec.org/library/atec-p&p104tools-web.pdf
Family Center On
Technology And Disability
The Department of
Education's Office of Special Education Programs has created the Family
Center on Technology and Disability (FCTD) to provide information about
assistive technologies to organizations that work with the families of
children with disabilities. ***Source: US Department of Education http://www.fctd.info
2003
AASA Conference Focused on How To Do More With Less
Though
the official conference theme was “Leadership in Changing Times,” the
unofficial theme of the 2003 AASA Conference was how to do more with
less—a reaction to the increased accountability in K-12 public education
spurred on by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and also the serious
budget shortfalls affecting states from coast to coast. Stressing that the
goals of NCLB were embraced by school leaders long before there was any
legislation to mandate them, AASA President John R. Lawrence
(Superintendent of the Troy School District in MO) introduced a new term
for “adequate yearly progress,” the benchmark for meeting the law’s
tough new requirements: “universal proficiency.”
Several suggestions were discusses on how to reach universal
proficiency. These include:
- Creating
community homework centers that are open after school and in the
evenings, where students can get the help they need from skilled
tutors (teachers and the “best and brightest” students).
- Using
specific software (demonstrated by various vendors at the conference)
that helps educators pinpoint student skill levels and identify those
students in need of extra assistance, and software that help school
leaders make more informed instructional decisions about using student
achievement information.
- Fostering
partnerships with members of the business community that bolster the
core mission of their respective institutions (Vendors presented
“guiding principles” to helping form successful alliances with
private-sector companies and showcased programs that exemplify the
spirit of school-business collaboration.)
***Source: eSchool News online, March 4, 2003. http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryalert.cfm?ArticleID=4268
MOREnet
K-12 Technology Network Program (K-12 TNP) FY04 Overview
--Submitted by Eric Nicklas, Program Manager, K-12 Technology
Network Program, MOREnet
FY04 Participation Fees
K-12 TNP participation fees will remain the same for FY04 as
in FY03. The participation fees are based on the number of certified
full-time staff in the school district as of July 1, 2002. MOREnet will
send (via U.S. postal mail) invoices for participation fees in August and
September 2003.
FY04 K-12 TNP Proposed Participation Fees*
Number of certified staff
49 or fewer
FTE
$1,500
50-99
FTE
$3,000
100-499
FTE
$4,500
500 or more
FTE
$6,000
*The proposed participation fees depend on final approval of
the Missouri State budget by the State Legislature. If the proposed budget
does not receive the necessary approval, the FY04 participation fees may
change.
K-12 TNP will provide the same services in FY04 that it
provided last year. Go to http://www.more.net/programs/k12tnp/services.html
for detailed information on the services available through MOREnet’s
K-12 TNP.
MOREnet will send (via U.S. postal mail) FY04 K-12 TNP
packets to superintendents in April. The program packets will contain
specific information on costs and services. Complete K-12 TNP information
is always available on MOREnet’s website at http://www.more.net/programs/k12tnp/.
kinetic (e-mail and Web Hosting)
MOREnet’s kinetic service allows school districts to
provide e-mail accounts to staff, students or both, and host their
websites with special features like a community calendar and search
engine.
kinetic provides a reliable, low-cost way for districts to
receive e-mail and Web hosting services:
E-mail accounts and webspace are administered locally.
A Web-based e-mail client will be
available soon.
The district does not incur the
trouble and expense of maintaining hardware and software associated with
providing these services.
MOREnet has been running this
service without interruption for more than 350 days.
Check out http://www.more.net/services/kinetic/
for more information.
FY04 kinetic
fees
$200 annual administrative fee
Number of accounts Annual cost per account
1-20
$4.00
21-100
$3.50
101-500
$3.00
501 or more
$2.50
Videoconferencing MCU port leasing
MOREnet will continue to provide videoconferencing
Multi-Channel Unit (MCU) port leasing for districts that want to deliver
H.323 videoconferencing services. MOREnet anticipates no increase in the
MCU lease fee structure for FY04. Complete MCU lease fee information will
be available on MOREnet’s website when it becomes available (http://www.more.net/technical/video/).
Questions?
Please direct questions about the costs and services
available through the K-12 Technology Network Program and MOREnet to Eric
Nicklas, K-12 TNP Program Manager, at (573) 884-7200 or eric@more.net.
Missouri Educational Technology Conference -- October 19-21, 2003
--Submitted by Eric Nicklas, Program Manager, K-12 Technology
Network Program, MOREnet
“Teacher-Driven
Technology” is the theme for the 2003 Missouri Educational Technology
Conference sponsored by Missouri’s Department of Elementary and
Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Research and Education Network (MOREnet).
The Missouri Educational Technology Conference provides information on
current technologies, solutions and future directions for educators,
administrators and technology specialists. Join more than 1,000
participants for over 100 presentations, workshops and hands-on
demonstrations in the newest technology and techniques in the fields of
education and educational technology. Visit more than 100 exhibits of the
latest equipment and materials, all on display at Tan-Tar-A in Osage
Beach, Missouri.
For complete details visit the conference website: http://www.more.net/services/conferences/fall2003/.
The online submission forms for conference presentations,
student exhibits, and vendors will be available in early March at the
conference website.
Presentation proposal applications will be accepted until
April 15, 2003.
Missouri teachers may submit their students’ technology
projects for consideration as student exhibits until April 15, 2003.
Vendors to the educational technology community are invited
to apply for booth space to exhibit their products and services. The
application deadline is October 3, 2003.
Online registration for “Teacher-Driven
Technology” will be available August 25 – October 3 from the
conference website.
Call for Student Exhibits: 2003 MO Educational Technology Conference
--Submitted
by Lisa Walters, Library Media and Technology Consultant, DESE
conferences@more.net
Deadline:
April 15, 2003
All
Missouri teachers are invited to submit their students' technology
projects for exhibition at the 2003 Missouri Educational Technology
Conference, October 19-21, 2003, at Tan-Tar-A in Osage Beach, Mo. This
opportunity provides students the chance to demonstrate and exhibit their
work. Not only do the students gain valuable experience in speaking with
individuals and communicating their ideas, but educators attending the
conference experience real examples of exciting uses of technology.
Projects
using technology that are written and/or produced by students are
appropriate for these exhibits. Only original student creations or
projects that have appropriate copyright permissions from original
copyright holders will be accepted for exhibition. Projects might include
videotaped documentaries, student-written tutorials, problem solving
exercises/games, CD-ROM applications, video yearbooks, computer-assisted
designs and/or drafting, computer programs, multimedia projects or other
applications of technology.
All
questions about exhibiting student projects at this event should be
directed to Lisa Walters at lwalters@mail.dese.state.mo.us or (573)
526-4900.
To
submit an application and find out complete information about the 2003
Missouri Educational Technology Conference, go to http://www.more.net/services/conferences/fall2003/.
The
Second Annual METPA Technology Leadership Awards
www.metpa.org
Nominations due May 1, 2003
Best District, School or Classroom
Web Page Award:
Nominate your District, building or classroom web page for
this annual recognition. Provide your URL on the form below for
consideration.
Judging Criteria:
Clarity of purpose:
The site clearly promotes the mission of the school or district.
Content: The site provides valuable content and clarity for the user.
Organization:
The site is logically organized; navigation tools are easy and intuitive
to use.
Appearance and design: The graphic
design of the site is appealing and inviting to the end-user.
Good use of
graphics and layout. Can be viewed clearly on multiple platforms and
multiple browsers.
Creativity and
Marketing:
The
site shows evidence of creativity and effective marketing of your
district, school or classroom.
Technology:
The site loads quickly and there are no dead-end or out of date links. The
site is ADA compliant and takes advantage of current technologies while
also allowing older browsers with few plug-ins to view the pages.
Best Practice Award -for Best
Practice in Technology Professional Development:
Nominate your district or building for your successful
implementation of a staff development effort that has led to the increased
integration of technology in your school or district.
Provide a summary not to exceed two pages which identifies
each of the criteria below.
Judging Criteria:
Description of
activity: A
brief description of the professional development effort. Who was the
target audience and what were
the proposed outcomes? What were the results?
Clarity of activity:
The
effort clearly promotes the mission of the school or district and advances
the effective use of instructional technology.
Ease of replication:
This activity could be replicated at other districts or buildings with
minimal problems .
Handouts or other
resource materials developed: (Not counted toward two page limit.) Please attach any
resources developed for this activity (may include links to web based
resources created specifically for this professional development
activity.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best District, School or Classroom Web Page Award:
Name of Contact person or
person making the nomination:______________________________
Contact e-mail
address:_________________________________________________________
School District:
_________________________________Phone Number:_________________
School Building (if
applicable)___________________________________________________
Web site
URL:_______________________________________________________________
Comments about your
site:______________________________________________________
Best
Practice Award - for Best Practice in Technology Professional Development:
Name
of Contact person or person making the
nomination:_______________________________
Contact
e-mail address:__________________________________________________________
School
District: _______________________________Phone
Number:_____________________
School
Building (if
applicable)_____________________________________________________
Staff
Development Activity
Title:___________________________________________________
Attach
all documentation for your Professional Development activity.
MAIL TO:
METPA TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP AWARDS c/o Doug Allen
4917 MILTON CT, INDEPENDENCE, MO 64055
For further information e-mail doug@dallen.us
2002 First Place winners are not eligible for 2003 Awards
Third Annual MoDLA Conference-- St. Louis, July 17-18
http://www.modla.org/ann_conf_03.pdf
Do you want to know more about interactive videoconferencing?
Do you want to know more about cost effective training for your
agency? Do you want to know more about emerging technologies? Do you want to know more about place-based learning?
Do you want to learn about the benefits of telemedicine? Then join us for the Third Annual Missouri Distance Learning
Association Conference, "Distance Learning: The Classroom of the
Future" to be held at the Sheraton Westport Chalet Hotel in St.
Louis, MO on July 17 and 18, 2003.
On Thursday, July 17th choose from two
pre-conferences. Barbara
Poore, Coordinator of Field Services for the Rural School and Community
Trust, will be presenting "Living and Learning in Place: Strategies
for Enhancing Student Learning and Improving Community Life," and Bob
Donaldson, President and Media Consultant for Communication Associates,
will present "Sustaining a Telemedicine Network." That evening, there will be a vendor reception and the opening
keynote delivered by Dr. Debbie Silver, an award winning educator with
thirty years experience as a classroom teacher, staff developer, and
university professor.
Activities on July 18th start with a morning
keynote by Marci Powell, president of Vibrant-C, a distance learning
consulting and training company. Marci
is also Vice President-Elect of State Chapters for the United States
Distance Learning Association. The
day follows with 24 break out sessions in the following strands: Teaching
and Learning, Classroom of the Future, Community Networking, E-Learning
Issues, Management Techniques and Initiatives, and Videoconferencing.
This conference offers ideas and support for integrating
distance learning into our professions. With ever shrinking budgets, distance learning offers real hope and
solutions for keeping staff and students alike on the cutting edge of
information and learning. Don't
miss this tremendous opportunity to learn more about distance learning and
how it will serve educators, healthcare and businesses now and in the
future! For more information,
or to register, go to www.modla.org or
call Dorothy White at 1-800-835-8282 ext. 250 or dwhite@csd.org
.
Improving Literacy Through
School Libraries Program (LSL)
http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/announcements/2003-1/030603b.html
(Federal Register: March 6, 2003 [CFDA# 84.364A]) (Federal
Government Library Grant)
The purpose of this program is to
improve student literacy skills and academic achievement by providing
students with increased access to up-to-date school library materials; a
well-equipped, technologically advanced school library media center; and
well-trained, professionally certified school library media specialists.
Eligible Applicants:
Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) in which at least 20 percent of the
students served by the LEA are from families with incomes below the
poverty line. (20 U.S.C. 6383). A list of LEAs with their
family poverty rates is posted on the web at: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/LSL
.
Applications Available: March 6, 2003.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: April 28, 2003.
Estimated Available Funds: $12,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards: $20,000 to
$350,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $75,000.
Estimated Number of Awards:
75-100.
Additional Information: Applicable
regulations, priorities, selection criteria, & other information are
available in the Federal Register notice.
Citizenship Educator Award
Citizenship Educator
The
Citizenship Educator is a law related education newsletter. For a
democracy to survive, its citizens must possess, at the least, an
understanding of the laws and the structure of its government. For a
democracy to thrive, its citizens must possess a commitment to improve
their communities and nation. Citizenship education develops the nation's
potential while enriching the lives of Missouri's students. Please visit
our archive of past issues of the Citizenship
Educator newsletter.
E.A. Richter Award Winners Honored
At the Spring Citizenship Education Conference, held recently in Columbia,
the Advisory Committee on Citizenship Education honored five individuals
and the bar´s YLS Section with the E.A.Richter Award for Excellence in
Citizenship Education. Pictured above are: (left to right) Dr. Rick Hardy,
Linda Hutton, YLS representative Brian Francka, E.A. Richter, Don
Barzowski, Timothy O´Rourke, Warren Solomon and Russ Sackreiter. The ACCE
also announced the creation of a new award, the Dr.Warren H. Solomon Award
for Civic Virtue, which will be given each year to an educator who
exemplifies the commitment to civics education that Dr. Solomon has
demonstrated throughout his career.
Show-Me TechKnowledge 2003
School Reports
The second annual Show-Me TechKnowledge Day was held on
February 26, 2003 from 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. in the Capitol Rotunda on
the third floor, in Jefferson City. This
was an opportunity for educators and students to showcase learning through
technology to invited Missouri legislators, students, parents, and
visitors. Representatives
from various educational groups, businesses, and organizations throughout
the state were supporters of the Show-Me TechKnowledge Day. Thirteen
school districts from across the state in grades K-12 displayed
outstanding technology projects currently being used in Missouri
classrooms to enhance learning and improve student achievement. Newsline is proud to share the following school reports.
Camdenton R-III
--Submitted by Nona HarringtonTechnology Education
Coordinator, Camdenton R-III Schools
The
Osage Beach Elementary School was honored to be selected to present our
4th-grade project on "Missouri" at the second annual Show-Me
TechKnowledge Day held on the third floor in the Capitol February 26,
2003. We hope those who watched our students present their projects
understand the positive effect technology has upon our teachers and
students.
Being
able to present at Show-Me Techknowledge Day brought new insight
and understanding to the students for the duties of our elected officials.
Our State Senator, Mr. John T. Russell and State Representative, Dr. Wayne
Cooper made our students feel so honored to be presenters by visiting the
students at their project center, and also by making them honorary
"Pages" for the day. They made them feel genuinely welcome, and
it was appreciated by our students, parents and teachers.
Princeton R-V
--Submitted by Megan Ormsby, Contemporary Issues Student,
Princeton High School
“3…2…1… This is a Tiger One Broadcast.” On February
25th and 26th, students in Dan Wiebers’ Contemporary Issues
class took a trip to Jefferson City for the second annual Show-Me
TechKnowledge Day to showcase their Tiger One Broadcast. Wiebers thought
TechKnowledge Day was a great experience for the students. “The students
and I got a chance to show off all of our hard work to government
officials and other schools.”
Terri Moore, Princeton High School’s technology
coordinator, discovered Show-Me TechKnowledge Day and was responsible for
entering the class in the presentation. Princeton High School’s Tiger One staff was one of thirteen
schools in the state of Missouri selected to participate.
Princeton’s project consisted of a video made by the
students explaining what is shown on their weekly news program, Tiger One,
which is based on the nationally known Channel One news broadcast for
secondary students. Tiger
One, which is shown every Friday, covers special projects at PHS along
with sporting events, class projects, and other school news. Also included in the video was a segment of the video yearbook
which will be sold at the end of the year.
At TechKnowledge Day, the students showed off their video
editing equipment for other students, district representatives, state
senators, and other visitors at the Missouri Capitol building. Shila Sperry, a participant of Tech Knowedge Day and member
of the class, felt that Princeton’s display was the best. “The best part of being able to show off our work at the Capitol
was the fact that our presentation seemed to be the most popular because
everyone was watching ours.” The
students also had the opportunity to share their video with our District
Representative Jim Whorton. Whorton
presented the class with a plaque and introduced the students as his
guests on the House floor.
Suzy Gauldin, member of the Contemporary Issues class,
believes that all of the hard work the class did paid off. “I was glad we were chosen to represent our district at
TechKnowledge Day. We worked as a team to make this happen and we did a
great job.”
Students who attended were Chad Tudeen, Josh Smith, Megan
Ormsby, Shila Sperry, Suzy Gauldin, Sarah Berger Jennifer Watkins, Nikki
Lutzen, Melinda Delameter and Keri Preston. Chaperones were George Scurlock, Lori Pulsand and Dan Wiebers.
Rebecca Franklin, member of the Contempory Issues class was unable
to attend due to illness.
Our first experience at the annual Show-Me Techknowledge Day
was exceptional. We thoroughly enjoyed showcasing our CLC / SALT program
to our legislators and the visiting public. We were pleased that our
program was so well received among all those who saw it. Our legislators
particularly liked the title of our presentation: “Steak on a Hamburger
Budget”. They were impressed that we were able to use resources from the
State Government, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Department of Natural Resources, MOREnet, State Fair Community College,
our own district, and our local community to make our ideas a reality.
With the looming budget cuts, we were also commended for making efficient
use of the resources that we were given.
Congrats go out to all participating school
districts for their desire to implement technology into the classroom. We
were particularly amazed at the amount of small, rural schools
participating in the event. Being from a small district, we were impressed
that schools of that size are able to provide their kids with the
education they deserve. Overall we were very impressed with the whole
event…from the setup and orchestration to the refreshments; everything
was handled in a wonderfully professional and efficient manner. Thanks for
a wonderful time.
(Pictured above are State Representative Tom Self and Warsaw
Superintendent Michael Stevenson)
"I
am impressed with their program and their ability to 'think outside the
box' when it comes to finding the funding for their project. It's this style of innovative thinking that not only separates
them, but must be incorporated into our budget structure process."
(Rep. Tom Self)
Missouri Schools and
Programs in the News
St. Louis City
St. Louis Public Schools recently received the Microsoft
Center of Excellence Award for their innovative use of K-12 technology. Read about their accomplishments, the program, and
how others can benefit from their experiences at www.microsoft.com/education/
Congratulations!
Clayton, Parkway South and Bayless
Paul Hoelscher’s international politics class
looks at war from United States perspective and beyond. The students are
providing answers to some questions about what is going on in the Middle
East. The Clayton High Videoconference story appeared in the Post Dispatch
on Thursday, March 6. Parkway
South and Bayless High School also participated in this videoconference
with Iraqi students. The St. Louis schools viewed the videoconference
only, while U.S. students at a high school in Connecticut and students in
Baghdad dialoged. St. Louis Consolidated School District provided the
bridge. Check out the full story at http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/News/807D21A92DB5A0E386256
CE1001F5EA1?OpenDocument&Headline=Politics+class+looks+at+war+from+U.S.+pers
pective+and+beyond+
Willard
Chip
Gann, eMINTS teacher at Willard East Elementary, and his students created
a project called “Where In Missouri Is Lou Smoo?” His class is fortunate to go on many field trips as they study
Missouri History. Unfortunately,
they cannot visit all of the interesting historical places that Missouri
has to offer. So they decided
to send a puppet named Lou Smoo to fourth grade classrooms across the
state to visit towns and go on field trips to historical areas with other
students. Through this
project they are learning more about our state through the eyes of Lou
Smoo and his host classrooms. The site is available for students across
the state to visit and learn along with them. Visit the travel log on the
website to view some of his adventures. http://www.emintsteachers.more.net/gannw/Lou/travel.htm
Copyright Question of the Month
Q. Who
could be involved as a vicarious infringer?
A. On
occasion, one person may be held liable for the infringing acts of another
person. This is called “vicarious liability.”
One person may be held liable for the infringing act of
another. In order to be held
vicariously liable for the acts of another, a person must:
1) have the right to control the actions of the other (even if
control is not actually exercised), and
2) receive a financial benefit, direct or indirect, from the
infringement.
NOTE: Lack of knowledge that the primary actor is actually
engaged in infringing conduct is not a defense under these circumstances.
In various circumstances, vicarious liability may be lacking
because of the absence of supervision over the person performing the
infringing activities or because of the absence of direct financial
interest in the infringing activities. Nevertheless, third party liability may still exist via
contributory infringement if the individual acts with knowledge and
his/her activities aid the primary infringer in accomplishing his/her
illegitimate activity.
Mark Your Calendar
|
April
1
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7-8
|
eMINTS Grant Reading
SuccessLink, Jefferson City, MO
|
|
10
|
MO Rural Opportunities Council Telecommunications/Education
Committee Meeting (1:15-3:30 pm)
Governor’s Office Building, Room 316, Jefferson City, MO
|
|
15
|
2003 Census of Technology online report due
|
|
24-25
|
Technology Plan Reading
Rooms 450 & 470, Governor Office Building, Jefferson
City, MO
|
|
25
|
Newsline articles due
|
| |